School self-evaluation: between the exercise of participatory democracy and the simple bureaucratic exercise
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5212/PraxEduc.v.19.23259.047Abstract
The self-evaluation process gives rise to a confrontation of rationalities that places, on the one hand, an instrumental and instrumentalizing self-evaluation and, on the other hand, a self-evaluation as an exercise in participatory democracy. In this context, the objective of this investigation was to understand how the educational actors of a Group of Schools participate in decision-making in the self-evaluation process. The study included quantitative and qualitative approaches, involving the application of a survey to a population of 217 teachers and the carrying out of 16 interviews, approved by the School Survey Monitoring service, of the Ministry of Education, Portugal. Summarized to the decision-making sphere of management bodies and their technostructures, it was concluded that participation in the self-evaluation process is devoid of an emancipatory action by its actors, which is why the path to a transformative self-evaluation that serves the democratic school has not yet been found.
Keywords: Self-assessment. Participation. Democratic school.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Práxis Educativa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
a) Authors keep the copyrights and concede the right of its first publication to the magazine. The work piece must be simultaneously licensed on the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the paper sharing, and preserves both the author identity and the right of first publication to this magazine.
b) Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, to not-exclusively distribution of the paper version published in this magazine (e.g.: publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with the author identity recognition and its first publication in this magazine.
c) Authors are permitted and stimulated to publish and distribute their papers online (e.g.: in institutional repository or on their personal webpage), considering it can generate productive alterations, as well as increase the impact and the quotations of the published paper.
d) This journal provides public access to all its content, as this allows a greater visibility and reach of published articles and reviews. For more information on this approach, visit the Public Knowledge Project, a project that developed this system to improve the academic and public quality of the research, distributing OJS as well as other software to support the publication system of public access to academic sources.
e) The names and e-mail addresses on this site will be used exclusively for the purposes of the journal and are not available for other purposes.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.