Ethnic-racial thinking: scientific knowledge, legal norms and education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5212/PraxEduc.v.17.19318.037Abstract
This research focuses on the analysis of narratives about the formulation of ethnic-racial thinking from Raimundo Nina Rodrigues’s academic productions carried out in the late nineteenth century. The purpose is to highlight how the narratives were constructed to include or not the indigenous and the black people in discursive textualities considering their power of naming, classification and hierarchization. In this study, legal devices were incorporated, corresponding to the Constitutions of the 19th and 20th centuries, in order to demonstrate tensions and detachments in the Brazilian ethnic-racial thinking. The analyzes were made using as theoretical support the philosophy of difference, with an emphasis on Foucault and the Cameroonian professor Achille Mbembe’s considerations. In the results, it is highlighted the symbolic power of institutional language used in scientific texts and legal provisions to segregate and degrade the indigenous and black people, being called as peoples who are: wild, barbarians, indolent, lazy and dangerous, to the detriment of civilized white people.
Keywords: Ethnic-racial thinking. Degeneration theory. Philosophy of difference. Education.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
a) Authors keep the copyrights and concede the right of its first publication to the magazine. The work piece must be simultaneously licensed on the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the paper sharing, and preserves both the author identity and the right of first publication to this magazine.
b) Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, to not-exclusively distribution of the paper version published in this magazine (e.g.: publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with the author identity recognition and its first publication in this magazine.
c) Authors are permitted and stimulated to publish and distribute their papers online (e.g.: in institutional repository or on their personal webpage), considering it can generate productive alterations, as well as increase the impact and the quotations of the published paper.
d) This journal provides public access to all its content, as this allows a greater visibility and reach of published articles and reviews. For more information on this approach, visit the Public Knowledge Project, a project that developed this system to improve the academic and public quality of the research, distributing OJS as well as other software to support the publication system of public access to academic sources.
e) The names and e-mail addresses on this site will be used exclusively for the purposes of the journal and are not available for other purposes.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.