FIM DO SUJEITO? CRÍTICA AOS EXTREMOS PÓS-MODERNOS E PÓS-ESTRUTURAIS DA TEORIA CURRICULAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5212/OlharProfr.v.20i2.0001Keywords:
Currículo, Teorias críticas, Teorias Pós-modernas.Abstract
O presente artigo aborda uma contraposição às críticas desenvolvidas por Tomaz Tadeu da Silva, à teoria curricular crítica, no texto “Monstros, ciborgues e clones: os fantasmas da Pedagogia Crítica”, que integra a obra “Pedagogia dos Monstros: os prazeres e os perigos da confusão de fronteiras”, organizada pelo mesmo autor. Apesar de suas importantes contribuições para o campo de pesquisa curricular, questiona-se, aqui, a posição adotada pelo autor citado,ao estancar a teoria curricular crítica, condenando-a à estagnação e ao determinismo. O artigo defende possibilidades de diálogo entre as concepções críticas, pós-modernas e pós-estruturais e também traz uma discussão conceitual acerca das distinções entre pós-modernismo e pós-estruturalismo. Por fim, enfatiza uma concepção curricular crítica que acolhe algumas contribuições pós-modernas, sem no entanto, desconsiderar algumas de suas concepções.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
a) Authors keep the copyrights and concede the right of its first publication to the magazine. The work piece must be simultaneously licensed on the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the paper sharing, and preserves both the author identity and the right of first publication to this magazine.
b) Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, to not-exclusively distribution of the paper version published in this magazine (e.g.: publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with the author identity recognition and its first publication in this magazine.
c) Authors are permitted and stimulated to publish and distribute their papers online (e.g.: in institutional repository or on their personal webpage), considering it can generate productive alterations, as well as increase the impact and the quotations of the published paper.
d) This journal provides public access to all its content, as this allows a greater visibility and reach of published articles and reviews. For more information on this approach, visit the Public Knowledge Project, a project that developed this system to improve the academic and public quality of the research, distributing OJS as well as other software to support the publication system of public access to academic sources.
e) The names and e-mail addresses on this site will be used exclusively for the purposes of the journal and are not available for other purposes.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
