Intellectuals of the GT7 of ANPEd: between the academic field and the intervention in the social world (1994-1999)

Authors

  • Ana Keli Moletta UEPG
  • Névio de Campos UEPG

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5212/PraxEduc.v.10i2.0013

Abstract

This paper aims to problematize the positions of intellectuals of the Grupo de Trabalho Educação de Crianças de 0 a 6 anos (GT7) (Working Group for the Education of Children from 0 to 6 years of age), and of the Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Educação (ANPEd) (National Association for Postgraduate studies and Research in Education), involved in elaborating and implanting the Referencial Curricular Nacional para a Educação Infantil (RCNEI) (National Curricular Guidelines on Children’s Education). This article is based on ANPEd’s collective view and on the book  Educação infantil pós-LDB: rumos e desafios (‘Post-LDB children’s education: direction and challenges’), as well as on the concepts of intellectual drawn by Pierre Bourdieu and Michel Foucault to sustain that the intellectuals of the GT7, in the name of autonomy in the academic field and scientific and specialized knowledge, adopted a critical posture towards the RCNEI when indicating the possibilities and mainly the limits of this policy presented by MEC.              

 

Keywords: Intellectual History. Intellectuals. Children’s education.

Author Biographies

  • Ana Keli Moletta, UEPG

    Mestre em Educação pela UEPG.

    Doutoranda em Educação pela UFSCAR

     

  • Névio de Campos, UEPG
    Doutor em Educação; Professor no Programa de Pós-Graduação  em Educação e no Programa de Mestrado em História da UEGP; Pesquisador na área de história da educação.

Published

2015-08-08

How to Cite

Intellectuals of the GT7 of ANPEd: between the academic field and the intervention in the social world (1994-1999). Práxis Educativa, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 2, p. 533–557, 2015. DOI: 10.5212/PraxEduc.v.10i2.0013. Disponível em: https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/6855. Acesso em: 30 apr. 2026.

Most read articles by the same author(s)