INSTRUMENTALISM AND GUARANTEEISM IN CIVIL PROCEDURE
WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE TO PROPOSE A CONCILIATORY ARRANGEMENT?
Abstract
The debate between the perspectives of instrumentalism and garantism resonates across various themes of civil procedure. The objective of the present study is to synthesize the propositions brought forth by each school of thought, in order to explore the criticisms that can be directed towards each of them, inclusively. The question arises, as a problematic issue, whether such conceptions - which touch upon the realm of the philosophy of the process - are irreconcilable or if there is room for a point of balance capable of offering strategies for the resolution of other issues in contemporary process. Ultimately, the aim was to demonstrate that the answer to the initial problem would be affirmative, allowing for the proposal of moderate syntheses between the two theses. The methodology and research techniques employed included dialectical and qualitative methods.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors maintain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows for the sharing of work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. This journal offers open access to its content to promote the visibility of articles and reviews published. For more information on this approach, visit the Public Knowledge Project, a project that improves the academic and public quality of research studies. This project supports the OJS and other open access publishing software for academic sources. Names and email addresses included on this site will be used exclusively for the journal's purposes and are not available for other purposes.