Digital technologies and subjectivities of education professionals: a critical study on the education of education professionals in Spain and Chile
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article critically examines the impact of digital technologies on the configuration of the subjectivities of education professionals during their university education in Spain and Chile. A qualitative approach was employed through structured interviews with 32 students enrolled in education-related degree programs at public universities. The analysis identifies five fundamental dimensions: everyday engagement with digital tools, imaginaries about the educational profession, pedagogical meanings of technologies, perception of artificial intelligence, and future professional projections. The findings reveal a field of tensions between technological fascination and critical awareness, innovation and precarization, agency and standardization. Drawing on biopolitical and psychopolitical theoretical frameworks, the study problematizes the effects of algorithmic rationalities on education and underscores the need for situated, critical digital literacy. Recommendations are provided to reimagine the education of education professionals as a space of resistance and emancipatory pedagogical construction in the face of growing educational techno-governmentality.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
a) Authors keep the copyrights and concede the right of its first publication to the magazine. The work piece must be simultaneously licensed on the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the paper sharing, and preserves both the author identity and the right of first publication to this magazine.
b) Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, to not-exclusively distribution of the paper version published in this magazine (e.g.: publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with the author identity recognition and its first publication in this magazine.
c) Authors are permitted and stimulated to publish and distribute their papers online (e.g.: in institutional repository or on their personal webpage), considering it can generate productive alterations, as well as increase the impact and the quotations of the published paper.
d) This journal provides public access to all its content, as this allows a greater visibility and reach of published articles and reviews. For more information on this approach, visit the Public Knowledge Project, a project that developed this system to improve the academic and public quality of the research, distributing OJS as well as other software to support the publication system of public access to academic sources.
e) The names and e-mail addresses on this site will be used exclusively for the purposes of the journal and are not available for other purposes.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
AGAMBEN, G. ¿Qué es un dispositivo? Buenos Aires: Adriana Hidalgo, 2011.
BRAUN, V.; CLARKE, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, v. 3, n. 2, p. 77-101, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa .
CHENEY-LIPPOLD, J. We are data: algorithms and the making of our digital selves. New York: New York University Press, 2017.
DENZIN, N. K.; LINCOLN, Y. S. (org.). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. 5. ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2018.
FLICK, U. An introduction to qualitative research. 6. ed. London: SAGE, 2022.
FOUCAULT, M. Seguridad, territorio, población: curso del Collège de France (1977-1978). Madrid: Akal, 2008.
FOUCAULT, M. Nacimiento de la biopolítica: curso del Collège de France (1978-1979). Madrid: Akal, 2009.
FOUCAULT, M. Vigilar y castigar: nacimiento de la prisión. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI, 2018.
FRICKER, M. La injusticia epistémica: el poder y la ética del conocimiento. Barcelona: Herder, 2017.
GARCÉS, M. Nueva ilustración radical. Barcelona: Anagrama, 2017.
HAN, B.-C. Psicopolítica: neoliberalismo y nuevas técnicas de poder. Barcelona: Herder, 2014.
HARAWAY, D. Ciencia, cyborgs y mujeres: la reinvención de la naturaleza. Madrid: Cátedra, 1995.
HERRERA-URÍZAR, G.; BLANCO-NAVARRO, M.; LOZANO-MULET, P.; NEUT-AGUAYO, P. ¿Interés comercial o pedagógico? Las plataformas educativas de las Big Tech y el libre desarrollo de la infancia. REICE: Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, v. 22, n. 2, p. 67-84, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2024.22.2.004 .
HOOKS, B. Enseñar a transgredir: la educación como práctica de la libertad. Madrid: Capitán Swing, 2021.
JACOVKIS, J.; PARCERISA, L.; HERRERA-URÍZAR, G.; FOLGUERA, S. ¿A quién educan las plataformas digitales? Equidad y ética educativa en un contexto de postpandemia. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), v. 25, e30444, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.30444 .
MACGILCHRIST, F. Cruel optimism in edtech: when the digital data practices of educational technology providers inadvertently hinder educational equity. Learning, Media and Technology, v. 44, n. 1, p. 77-86, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1556217 .
MASSÓ-GUIJARRO, B.; HERRERA-URÍZAR, G.; FOLGUERA-ÁLVAREZ, S.; ALONSO-CANO, C. Potencialidades y desafíos del uso de plataformas digitales educativas desde las voces de la comunidad educativa catalana. EDUTEC: Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, n. 87, p. 43-55, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2024.87.3023 .
MINAYO, M. C. de S. O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. 12. ed. São Paulo: Hucitec, 2012.
MOYLAN, R.; CODE, J. Algorithmic futures: an analysis of teacher professional digital competence frameworks through an algorithm literacy lens. Teachers and Teaching, v. 30, n. 3, p. 319-337, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2023.2263732 .
PARCERISA, L.; JACOVKIS, J.; RIVERA-VARGAS, P.; HERRERA-URÍZAR, G. Corporaciones tecnológicas, plataformas digitales y privacidad: comparando los discursos sobre la entrada de las BigTech en la educación pública. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, n. 42, p. 221-239, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.42.2023.34417 .
PATTON, M. Q. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 4. ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2015.
POZOS-PÉREZ, K.; HERRERA-URÍZAR, G.; RIVERA-VARGAS, P.; ALONSO-CANO, C. Use of mobile phones in classrooms and digitalisation of educational centres in Barcelona. Education Sciences, v. 13, n. 1, p. 21, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010021 .
RIVERA-VARGAS, P.; JACOVKIS, J.; HERRERA-URÍZAR, G.; CALDERÓN-GARRIDO, D. Plataformización educativa y profesionalidad docente: tensiones y nudos críticos. EDUTEC: Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, n. 87, p. 74-89, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2024.87.3107 .
ROUVROY, A.; BERNS, T. Gouvernementalité algorithmique et perspectives d'émancipation. Réseaux, v. 177, n. 1, p. 163-196, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/res.177.0163 .
SELWYN, N. Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2020.
SELWYN, N.; RIVERA-VARGAS, P.; HERRERA-URÍZAR, G. Critical studies on education and technology: paths taken and futures imagined. A dialogue with Neil Selwyn. Revista Izquierdas, n. 54, p. 1-13, 2025. Disponível em: http://www.izquierdas.cl/images/pdf/2025/54/Mono12Esp.pdf. Acesso em: 4 abr. 2025.
WILLIAMSON, B. Big data in education: the digital future of learning, policy and practice. London: SAGE, 2017.
WILLIAMSON, B.; BAYNE, S.; SHAY, S. The datafication of teaching in Higher Education: critical issues and perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education, v. 25, n. 4, p. 351-365, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1748811
ZUBOFF, S. La era del capitalismo de la vigilancia: la lucha por un futuro humano frente a las nuevas fronteras del poder. Barcelona: Paidós, 2020.