The research regulation and the biomedical field: considerations about an epistemic clash from the field of education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5212/PraxEduc.v.9i1.0010Abstract
This article discusses the research ethics regulations in contemporary Brasil, advocated by 196/1996 and 466/2012 Resolutions, and the CEP/CONEP System. We take into account the theoretical discussions in the Humanities and Social Sciences fields, from the educational research perspective. We analyze the ethical guidelines on research in 84 Postgraduate institutions, affiliated to FORPRED (Fórum de Coordenadores de Programas de Pós-Graduação em Educação), who answered to an online questionnaire, specially prepared by this forum. We present arguments constructed by Humanities and Social Sciences, especially in the Anthropology field, over the last decade, and we consider fundamental for the consolidation of this debate. We argue that the regulation of research ethics should be taken as part of a broader process in demanding regulatory agencies, by Social Sciences researchers.
Keywords: Research Ethics Regulations. CEP/CONEP System. Education Research.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
a) Authors keep the copyrights and concede the right of its first publication to the magazine. The work piece must be simultaneously licensed on the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the paper sharing, and preserves both the author identity and the right of first publication to this magazine.
b) Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, to not-exclusively distribution of the paper version published in this magazine (e.g.: publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with the author identity recognition and its first publication in this magazine.
c) Authors are permitted and stimulated to publish and distribute their papers online (e.g.: in institutional repository or on their personal webpage), considering it can generate productive alterations, as well as increase the impact and the quotations of the published paper.
d) This journal provides public access to all its content, as this allows a greater visibility and reach of published articles and reviews. For more information on this approach, visit the Public Knowledge Project, a project that developed this system to improve the academic and public quality of the research, distributing OJS as well as other software to support the publication system of public access to academic sources.
e) The names and e-mail addresses on this site will be used exclusively for the purposes of the journal and are not available for other purposes.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
