Mapping the knowledge domain of Landscape Architecture research between 1965 and 2018
Keywords:
Substantive Theory, Scientometrics, Ecosystem Services, Nature ContributionsAbstract
It was intended to analyze how landscape architecture, as a field of science, brings together innovative productions and perspectives to the thought and practice of landscape treatment. Initially used to diagnose and describe the structure of the landscape, currently, it has become a field of research integrated into approaching various environmental and socio-diversity issues. To represent the knowledge structure and evolution of Landscape Architecture, we used CiteSpace and VOSviewer software which pointed to the insurgency of issues related to Ecosystem Services, which arises new debates on landscape planning and management.
References
ALPAK, E.M.; OZKAN, D, G., DUZENLI, T. (2018) Systems approach in landscape design: a studio work. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. V. 2, p. 593-611.
ALBRECHT, C. (2018) A systemic approach for integrative design of buildings and landscapes: towards ecosystem services provision in urban areas, Pennsylvania.
ARTAXO, P. (2014) Uma nova era geológica em nosso planeta: o antropoceno. Revista USP, São Paulo, v. 103, p.13-24.
ARNOLD, CL.; GIBBONS, CJ. (1996) Impervious surface coverage - The emergence of key environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Assosciation, v.62 (2), p. 243-258.
BHARATDWAJ, K. (2009) Physical Geography: a landscape appreciations, Seachin Printers, Delhi.
BOWLER, D. E.; BUYUNG-ALI, L. M.; KNIGHT, T. M.; PULLIN, A. S. (2010) A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural enrironments. Public Health, v. 10, p. 456.
CHEN, C. (2004) Searching for intelectual points: prograssive knowledg domain visualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), v.101, 5303-5310.
CHEN, C. (2006) CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transiente patterns in scientific literature. Journal of American Society for information Science and technology, v.57 (3), p. 359-377.
CHEN, C. (2017) Science Mapping: a sistematic review of the literature.Journal of Data and Information Science, v. 2 (2), p. 1-40.
COMISSÃO MUNDIAL SOBRE MEIO AMBIENTE E DESENVOLVIMENTO – CMMAD (1988) Nosso Futuro Comum. Instituto de Documentação – Editora da Fundação Getúlio Varga, Rio de Janeiro.
COSTANZA, R.; D'ARGE, R.; de GROOT, R.; FARBERK, S.; GRASSO, M.; HANNON, B., et al. (1997) The Value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, v. 387, p. 253-260.
DANIEL, T. C.; MUHAR, A.; ARNBERGER, A.; AZNAR, O.; (2012) Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 109, p. 8812-8819.
De GROOT, RS.; ALKEMADE, R.; BRAAT, L.; HEIN, L. (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decidion making. Ecological Complexity, v. 7 (3), p. 260-272.
EGGHE, L. (2006) Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, v. 69 (1), p. 131-152.
FISCHER, B.; COZTANZA, R.; TURNER, R. K.; MORLING, P. (2009) Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, v. 68 (3), p. 643-653.
GARDNER, TOBY A. BARLOW, JOS. CHAZDON, R. EWERS, ROBERT M. HARVEY, CELIA A. PERES, CARLOS A. SODHI, NAVJOT S. (2009) Prospects for tropical forest biodiversity in a human-modified world. Ecology Letters, v12 (6), p. 561-582.
GOBSTER, P.H.; NASSAUER, J.I.; DANIEL, T.C.; FRY, G. (2007) The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landscape Ecology, v. 22, p. 959-972.
GUSTAFSON, E. J.; CROW, T. R. (1998) Simulating Spatial and Temporal Context of Forest Management Using Hypothetical Landscapes. Environmental Management, v. 22, p. 777-787.
HEWITT, Robert; NASSAR, Hala. (2012) Finding Multi-centers: using crowd-sourcing Technologies to define communities of landscape architecture, CELA.
HICKS, Diana; WOUTERS, Paul; WALTMAN, Ludo; RIJCKE, Sarah; RAFOLS, Ismael. (2015) Manifesto de Leiden sobre métricas de pesquisa. Nature, v.520, p. 429-431.
HOUGH, Michael (1995) Naturaleza y ciudad: planificación urbana y processos ecológicos. Gustavo Gili, Barcelona.
KAJIKAWA, Y., OHNO, J., TAKEDA, Y., MATSUSHIMA, K., KOMIYAMA, H. (2007) Creating na academic landscape of sustainability Science: na analysis of the citation network. Sustainability Science, v. 2, p. 221-231.
Kaplan, S. (1995) The restorative benefits of nature: toward na integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, v. 15, p. 169-182.
LILY, John T. (1999) Design for human ecosystems: landscape, land use and natural resources. Island Press, Washggton, DC.
McCarthy, J. (2010) Blended learning environmets: using social networking sites to enhance the first-year experience. Australian Journal of Educational Technology. v. 6, p. 729-740.
MCHARG, Ian L. (1967) Proyectar com la Naturaleza. Gustavo Gilli, As, Barcelona.
MURPHY, Michael D. (2016) Landscape Architecture Theory: na ecological approach. Island Press, Washiggton, DC.
PLIENINGER, T.; DIJKS, S.; OTEROS-ROZAS, E.; BIELING, C. (2013) Assesing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy, v. 33, p. 112-129.
SPINAK, Ernesto. Indicadores Cientométricos. Ci Inf., Brasília, v.27, n.2, p. 141-148, maio/ago. Disponível em < http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ci/v27n2/2729806.pdf> Acesso em maio de 2018.
SPIRN, Anne W. (1947) O jardim de granito: a natureza no desenho da cidade. Tradução: Paulo Renato Mesquita Pellegrino. Edusp, São Paulo.
SANTOS, Raimundo N. M.; KOBASHI, Nair Y. (2009) Bibliometria, Cientometria, Infometria: conceitos e aplicações. Pesquisa Brasileira em Ciência da Informação, Brasília, v.2, n.1, p. 155-172. Disponível em <http://www.brapci.inf.br/index.php/article/view/0000007766/> Acesso em fevereiro de 2019.
SAURA, S.; PASCUAL-HORTAL, L. (2007) A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: comparison with existing indices and application to a case study. Landscape and Urban Planning, v.83 (2,3), p. 91-103.
SCHENK, Luciana B. M. (2008) Arquitetura da Paisagem: entre o Pinturesco, Olmsted e o Moderno, São Carlos.
TERMORSHUIZEN, J. W.; OPDAM, P. (2009) Landscape Services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology, v. 24, p. 1037-1052.
TRESS, B.; TRESS, G. (2003) Scenario visualization for participatory landscape planning - a study from Denmark. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 64, p. 161-178.
WU, J. (2013) Landscape Sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, v.28, p. 999-1023.
ULRICH, R. (1984) View through a window may influence recovery from surfery. Science, v. 224, p. 420-421.
UEEMAA, E. M.; ÜLO MARJA, R. (2013) Trends in the use of landscape spatial metrics as landscape indicators: a review. Ecological Indicators.
VAZ, C.E.; CELANI, M.G.C.; DUARTE, J.M.P. (2011) An ontology representing Roberto Burle Marx’s landscape design solutions. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia. p. 389-398.
ZHU, Jie; HUA, Weijian. (2017) Visualizing the knowledge domain of sustainable development research between 1987 and 2015: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, v.110, p. 893-914.
ALBRECHT, C. (2018) A systemic approach for integrative design of buildings and landscapes: towards ecosystem services provision in urban areas, Pennsylvania.
ARTAXO, P. (2014) Uma nova era geológica em nosso planeta: o antropoceno. Revista USP, São Paulo, v. 103, p.13-24.
ARNOLD, CL.; GIBBONS, CJ. (1996) Impervious surface coverage - The emergence of key environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Assosciation, v.62 (2), p. 243-258.
BHARATDWAJ, K. (2009) Physical Geography: a landscape appreciations, Seachin Printers, Delhi.
BOWLER, D. E.; BUYUNG-ALI, L. M.; KNIGHT, T. M.; PULLIN, A. S. (2010) A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural enrironments. Public Health, v. 10, p. 456.
CHEN, C. (2004) Searching for intelectual points: prograssive knowledg domain visualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), v.101, 5303-5310.
CHEN, C. (2006) CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transiente patterns in scientific literature. Journal of American Society for information Science and technology, v.57 (3), p. 359-377.
CHEN, C. (2017) Science Mapping: a sistematic review of the literature.Journal of Data and Information Science, v. 2 (2), p. 1-40.
COMISSÃO MUNDIAL SOBRE MEIO AMBIENTE E DESENVOLVIMENTO – CMMAD (1988) Nosso Futuro Comum. Instituto de Documentação – Editora da Fundação Getúlio Varga, Rio de Janeiro.
COSTANZA, R.; D'ARGE, R.; de GROOT, R.; FARBERK, S.; GRASSO, M.; HANNON, B., et al. (1997) The Value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, v. 387, p. 253-260.
DANIEL, T. C.; MUHAR, A.; ARNBERGER, A.; AZNAR, O.; (2012) Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 109, p. 8812-8819.
De GROOT, RS.; ALKEMADE, R.; BRAAT, L.; HEIN, L. (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decidion making. Ecological Complexity, v. 7 (3), p. 260-272.
EGGHE, L. (2006) Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, v. 69 (1), p. 131-152.
FISCHER, B.; COZTANZA, R.; TURNER, R. K.; MORLING, P. (2009) Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, v. 68 (3), p. 643-653.
GARDNER, TOBY A. BARLOW, JOS. CHAZDON, R. EWERS, ROBERT M. HARVEY, CELIA A. PERES, CARLOS A. SODHI, NAVJOT S. (2009) Prospects for tropical forest biodiversity in a human-modified world. Ecology Letters, v12 (6), p. 561-582.
GOBSTER, P.H.; NASSAUER, J.I.; DANIEL, T.C.; FRY, G. (2007) The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landscape Ecology, v. 22, p. 959-972.
GUSTAFSON, E. J.; CROW, T. R. (1998) Simulating Spatial and Temporal Context of Forest Management Using Hypothetical Landscapes. Environmental Management, v. 22, p. 777-787.
HEWITT, Robert; NASSAR, Hala. (2012) Finding Multi-centers: using crowd-sourcing Technologies to define communities of landscape architecture, CELA.
HICKS, Diana; WOUTERS, Paul; WALTMAN, Ludo; RIJCKE, Sarah; RAFOLS, Ismael. (2015) Manifesto de Leiden sobre métricas de pesquisa. Nature, v.520, p. 429-431.
HOUGH, Michael (1995) Naturaleza y ciudad: planificación urbana y processos ecológicos. Gustavo Gili, Barcelona.
KAJIKAWA, Y., OHNO, J., TAKEDA, Y., MATSUSHIMA, K., KOMIYAMA, H. (2007) Creating na academic landscape of sustainability Science: na analysis of the citation network. Sustainability Science, v. 2, p. 221-231.
Kaplan, S. (1995) The restorative benefits of nature: toward na integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, v. 15, p. 169-182.
LILY, John T. (1999) Design for human ecosystems: landscape, land use and natural resources. Island Press, Washggton, DC.
McCarthy, J. (2010) Blended learning environmets: using social networking sites to enhance the first-year experience. Australian Journal of Educational Technology. v. 6, p. 729-740.
MCHARG, Ian L. (1967) Proyectar com la Naturaleza. Gustavo Gilli, As, Barcelona.
MURPHY, Michael D. (2016) Landscape Architecture Theory: na ecological approach. Island Press, Washiggton, DC.
PLIENINGER, T.; DIJKS, S.; OTEROS-ROZAS, E.; BIELING, C. (2013) Assesing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy, v. 33, p. 112-129.
SPINAK, Ernesto. Indicadores Cientométricos. Ci Inf., Brasília, v.27, n.2, p. 141-148, maio/ago. Disponível em < http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ci/v27n2/2729806.pdf> Acesso em maio de 2018.
SPIRN, Anne W. (1947) O jardim de granito: a natureza no desenho da cidade. Tradução: Paulo Renato Mesquita Pellegrino. Edusp, São Paulo.
SANTOS, Raimundo N. M.; KOBASHI, Nair Y. (2009) Bibliometria, Cientometria, Infometria: conceitos e aplicações. Pesquisa Brasileira em Ciência da Informação, Brasília, v.2, n.1, p. 155-172. Disponível em <http://www.brapci.inf.br/index.php/article/view/0000007766/> Acesso em fevereiro de 2019.
SAURA, S.; PASCUAL-HORTAL, L. (2007) A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: comparison with existing indices and application to a case study. Landscape and Urban Planning, v.83 (2,3), p. 91-103.
SCHENK, Luciana B. M. (2008) Arquitetura da Paisagem: entre o Pinturesco, Olmsted e o Moderno, São Carlos.
TERMORSHUIZEN, J. W.; OPDAM, P. (2009) Landscape Services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology, v. 24, p. 1037-1052.
TRESS, B.; TRESS, G. (2003) Scenario visualization for participatory landscape planning - a study from Denmark. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 64, p. 161-178.
WU, J. (2013) Landscape Sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, v.28, p. 999-1023.
ULRICH, R. (1984) View through a window may influence recovery from surfery. Science, v. 224, p. 420-421.
UEEMAA, E. M.; ÜLO MARJA, R. (2013) Trends in the use of landscape spatial metrics as landscape indicators: a review. Ecological Indicators.
VAZ, C.E.; CELANI, M.G.C.; DUARTE, J.M.P. (2011) An ontology representing Roberto Burle Marx’s landscape design solutions. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia. p. 389-398.
ZHU, Jie; HUA, Weijian. (2017) Visualizing the knowledge domain of sustainable development research between 1987 and 2015: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, v.110, p. 893-914.
Downloads
Published
2022-02-16
How to Cite
PINTO, A.; GUARALDO, E. Mapping the knowledge domain of Landscape Architecture research between 1965 and 2018. Terr@ Plural, [S. l.], v. 16, p. 1–24, 2022. Disponível em: https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/tp/article/view/17336. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2024.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Revista Terr@ Plural will obtain the auctorial rights for all published texts. This also implies that the text can be published anywhere in the world, including all rights on renewal, expansion, and dissemination of the contribution, as well as other subsidiary rights. The authors get permission to publish the contribution in other media, printed or digital, it may be in Portuguese or translation since the publication is credited to Revista Terr@ Plural. It allows the self-archiving of published articles in institutional repositories, thematic repositories, or personal web pages in the pdf version downloaded from the journal's site.
